World The World Bank Group Contact Us • Help/FAQ • Index • Search  
 
  Home > Contagion of Financial Crises > Definitions and Causes of Contagion
Contagion Home
Definitions of Contagion
Book on Contagion
Master Listing of Papers by Title
Papers on Contagion by Topic
Academic Links
Contact Us
 

 

The literature has used different definitions of contagion.

Broad Definition
Restrictive Definition
Very Restrictive Definition
Fundamental Links Among Countries
A Note on Herding Behavior
The Ultimate Cause of Contagion

Broad Definition:
Contagion is the cross-country transmission of shocks or the general cross-country spillover effects.

Contagion can take place both during "good" times and "bad" times. Then, contagion does not need to be related to crises. However, contagion has been emphasized during crisis times.

Back to top

Restrictive Definition:
Contagion is the transmission of shocks to other countries or the cross-country correlation, beyond any fundamental link among the countries and beyond common shocks. This definition is usually referred as excess co-movement, commonly explained by herding behavior.

Back to top

Very Restrictive Definition:
Contagion occurs when cross-country correlations increase during "crisis times" relative to correlations during "tranquil times."

Back to top

Fundamental Links Among Countries:
There are different categories of fundamental links:

  • Financial links exist when two economies are connected through the international financial system. One example of financial links is when leveraged institutions face margin calls. When the value of their collateral falls, due to a negative shock in one country, leveraged companies need to increase their reserves. Therefore, they sell part of their valuable holdings on the countries that are still unaffected by the initial shock. This mechanism propagates the shock to other economies. Another example of financial link is when open-end mutual funds foresee future redemptions after there is a shock in one country. Mutual funds need to raise cash and, consequently, they sell assets in third countries.
  • Real links are the fundamental economic relationship among economies. These links have been usually associated with international trade. When two countries trade among themselves or if they compete in the same foreign markets, a devaluation of the exchange rate in one country deteriorates the other country's competitive advantage. As a consequence, both countries will likely end up devaluing their currencies to re-balance their external sectors. Other types of real links, like foreign direct investment across countries, may also be present.
  • Political links are the political relationships among countries. This link is much less stressed in the literature. One example of political link is the following. When a country belongs to an association or "club of countries," with an exchange rate arrangement, the political cost of devaluing is much lower when other countries have devalued. Therefore, crises tend to be clustered. A crisis in one country is followed by crises elsewhere.

When fundamentals and commons shocks do not fully explain the relationship among countries, spillover effects have been attributed to herding behavior, either rational or irrational.

Back to top

A Note on Herding Behavior:
Different mechanisms explain herding behavior by international investors. The literature has emphasized that asymmetric information is at the root of these market reactions. Information is costly so investors remain uniformed about the countries in which they invest. Therefore, investors try to infer future price changes based on how the rest of the market is reacting. The relatively uninformed investors follow the supposedly informed investors. So all the market moves jointly. Moreover, investors reassess the risks of investing abroad when they see a foreign crisis. In this context, a change in Thailand's asset prices might be useful information about future price changes in Indonesia or Brazil. These types of reactions lead to herding behavior, panics, and "irrational exuberance."

Is it rational for investors to follow this "irrational" behavior? The literature suggests that, at a private level, it might be rational to follow the herd. Information is too costly, so each investor might benefit from looking at the market reaction. At a public level, contagion can be very costly. In a world of multiple equilibria, countries with relatively sound fundamentals might end up with balance of payments and banking crises.

Back to top

So, What Is the Ultimate Cause of Contagion?
This is a very hard question to answer. As you can find in this web site, different papers point toward different directions. Some claim that contagion is explained by real links, while others provide a financial explanation. At the same time, other studies argue that herding behavior is the key element to understand the recent contagious episodes. Although one can show that these factors are present in the cross-country transmission of crises, an even more difficult problem is to determine the relative importance of each component. For example, how much of the reaction toward Brazil, after the devaluation in Russia in mid 1998, was due to margin calls and how much to panics? Future papers in this web site might start to respond these important questions.




This page last updated on 09/15/00

Back to top
Top

 

 
Globe logo Contact Us | Help/FAQ Site Index | Search Home