Fragile States Task Team
In 2005,
the FTI Partnership commissioned a Background paper for
"Exploring the desirability and feasibility of expanding
the EFA FTI to Fragile States” which was
prepared by an inter-agency Task Team and presented to
the FTI Partnership during the Partnership meeting in
Beijing, November 2005.
The paper was structured around three main objectives:
defining fragility and the dimensions of educational
needs in selected fragile states; exploring
opportunities and constraints to scaling up FTI support
for the education sector in fragile states; and
presenting options for how the FTI could add value in
fragile states and to recommend preferred options.
The countries analyzed were the nine DAC fragile states
pilots (Solomon Islands, Sudan, DRC, Somalia, Zimbabwe,
Nepal, Haiti, Yemen, Guinea Bissau) and five mini case
studies (CAR, Burundi, DRC, Somalia, Sudan). This paper
emphasized that education should be a focus for
investment in fragile states and recommended that the
FTI Partnership emphasize the Education Program
Development Fund (EPDF) as the key tool for fragile
states, and to strengthen analytical work and to
accelerate sector planning.
The recommendation of the study was that the EPDF should
be emphasized as the key tool for fragile states. The
EPDF should therefore increase its focus on fragile
states, providing a platform for harmonization, and
making available funding for goods and services for
capacity building (consultants, capital items, funds for
workshops, study tour, etc.).
The FTI Partnership in Beijing decided that the
partnership should develop its capacity to support
fragile states. There was a general consensus that the
EPDF may provide a mechanism to support fragile states
to develop education sector programs. The task team on
fragile states was given the mandate by the partnership
to explore: (a) the modalities by which the EPDF can
assist in this regard, (b) the possible roles of UNICEF
and UNESCO, as well as (c) changes that may be needed in
the FTI framework to facilitate service delivery through
other channels, for example, through non-state actors.
In the Task Team's email exchanges post-Beijing, the
team concluded that they will focus on a few countries
to generate answers to these questions. Ideally this
would also build towards specific proposals from these
countries in the medium-term future, for EPDF funding
and possible FTI endorsement. The task team sought to
identify countries where there is a clear demand from
donor groups and partner governments (where appropriate)
to access the potential benefits of the FTI. The lead
donors in fragile states analyzed within the study were
contacted to test willingness and ability to take
forward the next step of this analysis in their
countries.
General documents:
·
Exploring the desirability and feasibility of expanding
the EFA FTI to Fragile States
(Report from Beijing)
·
Co-Chairs
Conclusions
(Task Team Mandate from Beijing)
·
Background
Note on Fragile States Task Team
·
Fragile
States Task Team List of Participants
Somalia documents:
·
Minutes of audio conference (May 25, 2006)
DRC
documents:
·
Minutes of audio conference (2006) (French)
·
Informational Note on DRC (French)
Haiti documents:
·
Minutes of
audio conference (2006) (French)
Burundi documents:
·
Minutes
of audio conference (11 October 2006)
For more information about the Task Team
please contact Adaeze Igboemeka (A-Igboemeka@dfid.gov.uk),
or Anna Triponel at the FTI Secretariat (atriponel@worldbank.org).
|